The Heavy Bible —S. of P. Treas. Chest

Charge

This charge comes to us from Dirk Anderson's web site.

The web page in question declares to be a myth the story that Mrs. White held up a heavy Bible longer than humanly possible while in vision. Part of the evidence offered in support of this charge is the contradictions seen between two accounts of the same incident. The first account is that of John Loughborough:

I will here state some facts respecting her third vision...related to me by Mrs. White's father and mother, by her sister, Mrs. Sarah Belden, and others. In the room where the vision was given, there was lying on the bureau a very large family Bible...and weighs a little over 18 pounds. While in vision, she arose, and took this heavy Bible on her left arm, the book lying open, and held it out at right angles with her body; and then for over half an hour, with her right hand, turned from place to place, and pointed to different texts of Scripture, which she repeated while her eyes were looking upward...in every instance she was repeating the Scripture upon which her finger was resting. (Great Second Advent Movement, pp. 236-37)

The second account is that of Mrs. Frances (Howland) Lunt:

In comparing these two accounts, Dirk highlights the following contradictions:

[Note: Because of our research, the last two excerpts above have been silently removed from the web page in question. They were first posted no later than 1999 and were removed sometime around January 2004. See Revision Notes.]

Initial Observations

What we find peculiar is that a book by Loughborough would contain such contradictory accounts on adjoining pages. His recitation of the account of others is on pages 236 and 237 of his book, and he then includes Mrs. Lunt's apparently contradictory account on the very next page, page 238. Was he that stupid?

Analysis

Both accounts contains ellipses, which suggests that further investigation is in order. Do the deleted portions shed any light on this topic? For the sake of completeness, we will quote both accounts in their entirety, with the the deleted portions in a different color.

To our surprise, we discover that Loughborough's and Lunt's accounts are of two totally different events! The former occurred at her parents' home in Portland, and the latter occurred in Topsham. Both visions involved the same Bible edition, but they weren't even the same copy!

The deletions made to Mrs. Lunt's account particularly attract our attention. In light of these deletions, let us reexamine each of the alleged four contradictions:

The weight of the Bible in Mrs. Lunt's account is enclosed in brackets, indicating that Loughborough, not Mrs. Lunt, said that the Bible was 18 pounds. Because the brackets were deleted, the reader of Dirk's web page has no way to know this, and indeed is led to believe that Mrs. Lunt authored every word cited.

It thus appears that Loughborough wanted us to know that the Bible was a little over 18 pounds. Then, after informing us of that fact, he later rounds off the number to 18 pounds. (However, the fact that the one Bible contained the apocrypha (Ellen G. White: The Early Years, p. 92) and the other did not (Manuscript Releases, vol. 15, p. 66), would also make a difference in weight between the two Bibles.)

Something isn't quite right with this one. Notice carefully again the words of Mrs. Lunt, with emphasis added:

Loughborough stated that Mrs. White held the Bible out in her left arm, but Mrs. Lunt is addressing something entirely different. The forty-five degree angle she refers to is that of Mrs. White's hand, not her arm!

Anyone can hold "any book" of any reasonable weight with one's arm at a forty-five degree angle without it slipping from "the hands," but the palm is another matter. Try it and see, but don't use any glue.

It is apparent that Loughborough is talking about the entire length of time that Mrs. White held the Bible, while Mrs. Lunt is talking about the length of time that she held it in her palm. Thus she held it for several minutes in her palm, out of a total time of, of, well, we don't really know how long. Consider the next account of the Topsham vision given by Loughborough:

Mrs. Truesdail's Testimony . . . "I was fifteen years old in 1845, and was present at the time of Sister Harmon's first visit to Topsham, when she had the vision at the house of Brother Curtiss, where she took up the great family Bible and held it up in a position in which none of the others could hold a book on the hands without its slipping off at once. "Sister Harmon was in vision over two hours. . . . she read to us passages so comforting and appropriate in our trying position; such as Heb. 2:2, 3; James 5:7, 8; Heb. 10:35, 39; 1 Peter 1:7; Luke 12:32-37, besides many others, holding the large family Bible so high that I was obliged to stand on a chair to read where she was pointing. I do not think Sister Harmon was over two inches the taller." (Ibid. p. 238, 239)

The entire vision lasted two hours, but how long she held the Bible up during that time we do not know.

To the contrary, it is indeed possible. Did Mrs. Lunt mean that Mrs. White pointed at texts while the Bible was lying in her left arm? Nothing implausible there. Did she mean that Mrs. White pointed at texts while the Bible was at a forty-five degree angle in her palm. Again, nothing implausible about simply pointing at texts while in either position.

Further Analysis

Where the above mentioned measurements of the Bible came from, "27 inches by 11 inches," is a puzzle. The original source said 18 by 11 inches. This raises the question of whether Dirk was quoting his material from another critic, but failed to give proper credit.

The same question was also brought to our minds by the fact that Mrs. Lunt's account as quoted was inaccurate. We therefore wrote to Dirk on September 07, 2003:

He responded on the 13th (the ellipsis is his):

Specific Conclusions

There are no apparent contradictions between the two accounts, accounts of two different events, when the sources are read in their entirety. Those wishing to discredit the claimed supernatural nature of these incidents will need to resort to other evidence.

General Conclusions

Improperly altered quotations can be explained in several ways:

1. Simple human oversight.
2. Carelessness.
3. Dishonesty.
4. Plagiarism.

On that last possible explanation, we would strongly recommend that critics do not merely copy from each other, without bothering to do their own independent research in the original sources. And whenever they do quote from each other, they should always give proper credit, just like an English teacher would require for a research paper in school: "as quoted by so and so in such and such."

This is all the more important in light of the fact that one of the charges most often leveled at Mrs. White is that of plagiarism. For a critic to not give proper credit himself gives Mrs. White's apologists an apparently legitmate complaint against them of hypocrisy.

Notes on Revisions

Around January 2004, Dirk removed all accusations about contradictions between Loughborough's and Lunt's accounts. He is to be commended for doing so. Yet he still, as we initially did in the first version of this page, makes the mistake of thinking that these two accounts are of the same event.

Unfortunately, it appears that one is left without solid evidence upon which to call into question these Bible-holding incidents. At least, if there is such solid evidence, his revised web page does not mention it.

Thus we are left with:

1. Ellen White's parents claiming that she held a heavy Bible in her outsretched arm for 30 minutes during a vision, a Bible that she in her sickly condition could not even pick up at other times.
2. Mrs. Lunt and Mrs. Truesdail claiming that in another vision at another location, she held the same edition of the Bible a) in her palm at an angle at which it should have slipped, but didn't, and b) high enough that one girl had to stand on a chair in order to read it.
3. Yet another account of a third incident, not quoted above, about a heavy Bible that was held up sometime during a six-hour vision at Randolph, Massachusetts, in which the Bible was "lifted up as high as she could reach" (Ibid., p. 243).
4. In each of the three incidents, the testimony of the eyewitnesses was that Ellen White turned and pointed at texts and quoted them correctly, while not looking at where she was pointing.

We await the discovery of any new evidence that might prove these eyewitness accounts to be incorrect.

Give Us Your Opinion

What do you think of "Lofted a Heavy Bible"?

All it proves is that her visions were not merely human. One would need to apply the Bible tests of a prophet to know if she was inspired of God or not. 66.4% Holding a heavy Bible up for that length of time proves beyond a doubt that she was a true prophet. 18.6% I know for certain that the incident described on this page never happened. 10.0% I'm not sure what to think about things like this. I have to do some more research. 5.0% Total Votes: 140